Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1908

Seymour v. Goodwin

Seymour v. Goodwin
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided November 16, 1908 · Affirmance, Bergen, Bogert, Dill, Garrison, Grai, Green, Min, None, Reed, Reversal, Swayze, Trenchard, Turn, Yoorhees, Yredenburgh, Yroom
74 N.J. Eq. 856; 72 A. 123; 1908 N.J. LEXIS 292

Seymour v. Goodwin

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

It has previously been decided that the -bill of complaint herein sets up a good cause of action. Seymour v. Goodwin, 68 N. J. Eq. (2 Robb.) 189; 69 N. J. Eq. (3 Robb.) 833. The cause came on to final hearing before Vice-Chancellor Stevens, who held that the material allegations of the bill were sustained by the evidence, and thereupon advised a final decree for the complainant. We agree with his conclusions, -and the decree should therefore be affirmed, with costs.

*857For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Bergen, Yoorhees, 'Min-turn, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Yroom, Green, Grai, Dill —15. For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.