Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1909

State Council v. Hollywood Council

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided March 1, 1909 · Affirmance, Bergen, Bogert, Chiee, Djll, Garrison, Gray, Min, None, Parker, Reed, Reversal, Swayze, Trenchard, Turn, Voorhees, Vredenburgii, Vroom

75 N.J. Eq. 292; 72 A. 24; 1909 N.J. LEXIS 277

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Harker v. McKissock (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1948)
B. & S. Excavating & Construction Co. v. Angelo Paino Construction Corp. (N.J. 1932)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This case differs from the case of State Council v. Enterprise Council, decided this day, only in the fact that Hollywood council is an unincorporated association, and derived its permission to organize from the state council of New Jersey instead of the state council of Pennsylvania. We do not think that these facts distinguish the case in any of its essential features from the case of Enterprise council, and, for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the decree in the present case must be reversed, with costs.

For affirmance—None.' For reversal—The Chancellor, Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Min-turn, Bogert, Vredenburgii, Vroom, Gray, Djll—15.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.