Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1909

Reynolds v. New York & Eastern Telegraph & Telephone Co.

Reynolds v. New York & Eastern Telegraph & Telephone Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided March 1, 1909 · Affirmance, Bergen, Bogert, Chard, Garrison, Gray, Minturn, None, Parker, Reed, Reversal, Swayze, Voorhees, Vredenburgh
75 N.J. Eq. 298; 5 Buchanan 298; 78 A. 1135; 1909 N.J. LEXIS 311

Reynolds v. New York & Eastern Telegraph & Telephone Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the per curiam, opinion filed at the present term in the case of New York and Eastern Telegraph and Telephone Co. v. Great Eastern Telephone Co. et al.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Tren chard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh,’ Gray—12. For reversal—None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑