Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1909

Marsh v. Vanness

Marsh v. Vanness
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 14, 1909 · Affirmance, Bergen, Bogert, Garrison, Gray, Iiee, Minturn, None, Parker, Reed, Reversal, Swayze, Trenchard, Voorhees, Vredenburgi, Vroom
75 N.J. Eq. 607; 5 Buchanan 607; 74 A. 47; 1909 N.J. LEXIS 304

Marsh v. Vanness

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings of fact of the learned vice-chancellor, and upon that ground affirm this decree without considering the question of pleading involved. Costs were properly allowed the complainant, this being a foreclosure suit. P. L. 1902 p. 528 § 53.

For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, .Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Vroom, Gray, Died—14. For reversal—None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.