Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1909

Marsh v. Vanness

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 14, 1909 · Affirmance, Bergen, Bogert, Garrison, Gray, Iiee, Minturn, None, Parker, Reed, Reversal, Swayze, Trenchard, Voorhees, Vredenburgi, Vroom

75 N.J. Eq. 607; 5 Buchanan 607; 74 A. 47; 1909 N.J. LEXIS 304

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Carson v. Cook County Liquor Co. (Okla. 1913)
Mooney v. Petnick (New Jersey Court of Chancery 1929)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings of fact of the learned vice-chancellor, and upon that ground affirm this decree without considering the question of pleading involved. Costs were properly allowed the complainant, this being a foreclosure suit. P. L. 1902 p. 528 § 53.

For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, .Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Vroom, Gray, Died—14. For reversal—None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.