Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1909

Kunz v. Mason

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 14, 1909 · Affirmance, Bergen, Bogert, Chiee, Congdon, Dill, Eeed, Garrison, Gray, Iard, Minturn, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Trenoi, Voorhees, Vredenburgh, Vroom

75 N.J. Eq. 616; 5 Buchanan 616; 73 A. 869; 1909 N.J. LEXIS 301

Counsel

Messrs. Wilson, Carr & Stackhouse, for the appellants., d/essrs. Garrison & Voorhees, for the respondents.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Learning, delivered in the court below.

For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Eeed, Trenoi-iard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Dill, Congdon—15. For reversal—None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.