Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1909

Gargia v. Foster

Gargia v. Foster
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 14, 1909 · Affirmance, Aooii, Bergex, Bogert, Congdon, Cueiam, Dill, Gar, Gray, Hees, Iiisox, Minturn, Parker, Reed, Swayze, Teenciiaed, Vbedenburgh, Yroom
77 N.J.L. 802; 73 A. 514; 1909 N.J. LEXIS 231

Gargia v. Foster

Opinion of the Court

Per Cueiam.

This writ of error brings up the final judgment of the Supreme Court. The questions raised are the same as those that were decided by the Supreme Court upon a demurrer to pleas. Simons v. Foster, 44 Vroom 338. For the reasons stated in the opinion of Chief Justice Gummere, the judgment in the present case is affirmed. The judgment for defendant upon demurrer having been followed by the entry of a rule to plead over, is not brought up by the plaintiff’s writ of error to the final judgment and does not militate against the suing out of such writ.

For affirmance—The ChaNcelloR, Chief Justice, Gar-iiisox, Swayze, Reed, TeeNCiiaed, PARKER, Bergex, Aooii-hees, MiNturN, Bogert, Vbedenburgh, Yroom, Gray, Dill, CoNGDON, J.J. 16.

For reversal-—None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.