Harrison v. Axtell
Harrison v. Axtell
76 N.J. Eq. 614; 6 Buchanan 614; 75 A. 1100; 1910 N.J. LEXIS 256
Harrison v. Axtell
Opinion of the Court
We concur in the opinion expressed by the ordinary that the respondent Axtell fairly sustained the burden of showing that the will was not the product of undue influence, but of the full and independent judgment of the testatrix, and, for this reason, affirm the decree under review.
For affirmance—Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Tbenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voori-iees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Congdon—14.
For reversal—Fone.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.