Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1910

Harrison v. Axtell

Harrison v. Axtell
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided February 28, 1910 · Pee
76 N.J. Eq. 614; 6 Buchanan 614; 75 A. 1100; 1910 N.J. LEXIS 256

Harrison v. Axtell

Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

We concur in the opinion expressed by the ordinary that the respondent Axtell fairly sustained the burden of showing that the will was not the product of undue influence, but of the full and independent judgment of the testatrix, and, for this reason, affirm the decree under review.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Tbenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voori-iees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Congdon—14.

For reversal—Fone.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.