Van Horn v. Demarest

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Van Horn v. Demarest, 77 N.J. Eq. 264 (N.J. 1910)
77 A. 369; 1910 N.J. LEXIS 272

Van Horn v. Demarest

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decreepn this ease should be affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Stevenson. We are not to be understood, however, as holding that the case was one of equitable jurisdiction. Ho objection was made on this ground, and it would be wrong to dismiss the bill for that reason at this stage of the proceedings.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Dili, Congdon — 14.

For reversal — Hone.

Reference

Full Case Name
John D. Van Horn, complainant-appellant v. Samuel R. Demarest, Jr., , defendants-respondents
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published