Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1910

Van Horn v. Demarest

Van Horn v. Demarest
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 20, 1910
77 N.J. Eq. 264; 77 A. 369; 1910 N.J. LEXIS 272

Van Horn v. Demarest

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decreepn this ease should be affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Stevenson. We are not to be understood, however, as holding that the case was one of equitable jurisdiction. Ho objection was made on this ground, and it would be wrong to dismiss the bill for that reason at this stage of the proceedings.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Dili, Congdon — 14.

For reversal — Hone.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.