National Fire Proofing Co. v. Daly
National Fire Proofing Co. v. Daly
Opinion of the Court
The appeals in the above four cases are, each of them, taken from the same decree. Upon all the questions raised by them we concur in the views expressed by Vice-Chancellor Stevens, in the opinion filed by him in the court of chancery. The decree under review will be affirmed.
No. 21—
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Tbenci-iard, Bergen, Voorhees, Mintuen, Bogert, Vredenburgtt, Dill, Congdon — 11.
For reversal — Parker—1.
No. 22—
For affirmance, — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenciiabd, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Mintuen, Bogert, Vredenburgit, Dill, Congdon — 12.
For reversal — None.
No. 23— '
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trencitard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgit, Dill, Congdon — 12.
For reversal — None.
For affirmance. — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Yoorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Dill, Congdon- — 1.2.
For reversal — Hone.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- National Fire Proofing Company, complainant-respondent v. William H. Daly, defendants-appellants National Fire Proofing Company, complainant-respondent v. William H. Daly, defendants-appellants National Fire Proofing Company, complainant-respondent v. William H. Daly, defendants-appellants William C. Foster, trustee in bankruptcy, &c. v. Board of Education of Hoboken
- Status
- Published