Christiansen v. W. H. & F. W. Cane

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Christiansen v. W. H. & F. W. Cane, 80 N.J.L. 460 (N.J. 1910)
51 Vroom 460; 77 A. 517; 1910 N.J. LEXIS 235

Christiansen v. W. H. & F. W. Cane

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Eo bill of exceptions has been filed with the writ of error, and although the attention of counsel was called to the defect upon the argument, the lack has not been supplied. Eo error has been made to appear to us and the judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Gray, Dill, Congdon, JJ. 14.

For reversal—Eone.

Reference

Full Case Name
CHARLES CHRISTIANSEN, IN ERROR v. W. H. & F. W. CANE, IN ERROR
Status
Published