Cochrane v. Piskorski
Cochrane v. Piskorski
Opinion of the Court
This writ of error brings before ns for review a judgment of the Supreme Court affirming a judgment of the First Dis
The Supreme Court held that the questions of the negligence of the defendant and of the contributory negligence of the plaintiff were properly submitted to the jury, and that the motions made for a nonsuit and for a direction of a verdict in favor of the defendant were properly refused.
We agree with the view of the Supreme Court, and the judgment should therefore be affirmed.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Congdon, White, Treacy, JJ. 13.
For reversal—None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.