The opinion of the court was delivered by

The order appealed from is attacked upon the ground that, in making it, the court was not acting for the best interests of the child. We find that the contrary is the fact.

The order under review will be affirmed.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Syvayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Voori-tees, Minturn, Vredenrurgi-i, Congdon, White, Treacy—12.

For reversal—None.