Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1913

Heath v. Maddock

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided November 17, 1913 · Affirmance, Bergen, Buhgi, Congdon, Garrison, Iteppbnhéimer, Iune, Kaliscit, Minturn, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Teri, Trenohard, Vreden, White

82 N.J. Eq. 366; 12 Buchanan 366; 91 A. 1069; 1913 N.J. LEXIS 371

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons 'stated in-the opinion filed in the court below by the ordinary.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kaliscit, Vreden-BUHGI-I, CONGDON, WHITE, TERI-IUNE, ITePPBNHÉIMER-13. ■ ■ • For reversal—-None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.