Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1913

Heath v. Maddock

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided November 17, 1913 · Affirmance, Bergen, Buhgi, Congdon, Garrison, Iteppbnhéimer, Iune, Kaliscit, Minturn, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Teri, Trenohard, Vreden, White

82 N.J. Eq. 366; 12 Buchanan 366; 91 A. 1069; 1913 N.J. LEXIS 371

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Clark v. State Bar (Cal. 1952)
Austin v. Millard (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1978)
Bartel v. Clarenbach (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1971)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons 'stated in-the opinion filed in the court below by the ordinary.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kaliscit, Vreden-BUHGI-I, CONGDON, WHITE, TERI-IUNE, ITePPBNHÉIMER-13. ■ ■ • For reversal—-None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.