Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1913

McGrath v. Norcross

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided November 17, 1913 · Affirmance, Bergen, Ciiier, Congdon, Garrison, Hbppbni, Iard, Ieimer, Iitb, Kalisch, Minturn, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Teriiune, Trenci, Vrkdbnburgh

82 N.J. Eq. 367; 12 Buchanan 367; 91 A. 1069; 1913 N.J. LEXIS 372

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Mezey v. United Jersey Bank (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1992)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from will be' affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion hied in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

For affirmance—Ti-ra Ciiier-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, VrkdbnBURGH, CONGDON, Wl-IITB, TERIIUNE, HbPPBNI-IEIMER—13. For reversal—None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.