Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1913

Taylor v. Borden

Taylor v. Borden
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided October 16, 1913 · Affirmance, Bergen, Congdon, Garrison, Heppeni, Ietmer, Iune, Kalisch, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Teri, Trenohard, Yoorhees, Yredenburgh
82 N.J. Eq. 369; 12 Buchanan 369; 91 A. 1071; 1913 N.J. LEXIS 374

Taylor v. Borden

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The testimony in the cause fully sustains the facts found by the learned vice-chancellor. Upon those facts the complainant was clearly entitled to the relief granted to him. The decree appealed from will be affirmed.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Yoorhees, Kalisch, YredenBURGH, CONGDON, TeRI-IUNE, HePPENI-IETMER—12. For reversal—None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑