Ryan v. Morris
Ryan v. Morris
Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Sarah E. Evan brought a suit in ejectment for a small tract of land, claiming title thereto under a deed given by Cathalina Mead to her, dated January 5th, 1912. The defendant claimed title under the Vredenburgh deed dated February 19th, 1912, Vredenburgh having acquired title from Cathalina Mead, June 9th, 1908. Upon this statement of facts the court directed a verdict for the defendant.
It would appear that the deed io Vredenburgh conveyed three tracts of land. The first tract has an exception described in brackets. The second tract is said to he the same tract that was thus excepted from the first tract. The third tract has no connection with this suit.
I cannot see that there is any doubt about the part included in brackets being an exception, and that the second tract was an additional tract conveyed hv the same deed, and is the same as that excepted from the first tract.
The second tract begins: “And also all that certain strip of land,” &c. This shows that it is an additional conveyance.
The trial court decided properly, and as there was nothing to submit to the jury’it properly directed a verdict for the defendants.
For affirmance — The Ohieb Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Yoorhees, Minturn, Kal-ISCH, CONGDON, WHITE, TERHUNE, IIePPENHBIMER, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- SARAH R. RYAN v. FANNIE MORRIS AND FREDERICK LUMBREYER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
- Status
- Published