Corcia v. Giuliano
Corcia v. Giuliano
85 N.J.L. 369; 56 Vroom 369; 87 A. 94; 1913 N.J. LEXIS 290
Opinion of the Court
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Bogert, Vreden-BURGIT, CONGDON, TREACY, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.