Sexton v. Newark District Telegraph Co.
Cases that cite this one
15 later published cases cite this decision.
- Lamanna v. Proformance Insurance (N.J. 2005)
- Smith v. Penta (N.J. 1979)
- William Pace v. Hamilton Cove (N.J. 2024)
- Van Duren v. Rzasa-Ormes (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2007)
- Fitzgerald v. Coddington Stables (N.J. 2006)
- Mt. Hope Development Associates v. Mt. Hope Waterpower Project, L.P. (N.J. 1998)
- Petrolia v. Estate of Nova (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1995)
- McAllister v. Bd. of Ed., Kearny (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1963)
- Fisch v. Manger (N.J. 1957)
- Magierowski v. Buckley (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1956)
- Danek v. Hommer (N.J. 1952)
- Danek v. Hommer (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1951)
- State v. Court of Common Pleas (N.J. 1948)
- Geraghty v. Lehigh Valley R. Co. (2d Cir. 1936)
- Hawkins v. Bleakly (Supreme Court of the United States 1917)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed. The opinion filed in that court, which deals -with some topics that are not stirred upon this appeal, deals also and in a manner entirely satisfactory to us with the point upon which this appeal is argued bjr- counsel, viz., the legal situation presented by the fact that the statute of May 3d, 1911, took effect upon the day on which the plaintiff’s intestate was killed.
For the reasons given upon this branch of the case by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court, the judgment of that court is affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, Bogert, Yre-DENBURGH, WHITE, HEPPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, JJ. 13.
For reversal — Kone.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.