Mueller v. Boulevard Commissioners
Mueller v. Boulevard Commissioners
87 N.J.L. 702; 94 A. 84; 1915 N.J. LEXIS 277
Mueller v. Boulevard Commissioners
Opinion of the Court
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam of the Supreme Court adopting the reasons given by Mr. Justice Swayze in discharging the rule to show cause why a writ of certiorari should not issue.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Ciiiee Justice, Garrison, Trencharl, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Vredenburgii, White, Terhune, Williams, JJ. 11.
For reversal—Hone.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.