Materka v. Erie Railroad
Materka v. Erie Railroad
88 N.J.L. 372; 95 A. 612; 1915 N.J. LEXIS 331
Opinion of the Court
The' judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court.
For afjwmance—Ti-ie Chancelloe, Gabbison, Swayze, Tbenohabd, Bergen, Mintuen, Black, Heppenheimbe, Williams, Taylor, JJ. 10.
For reversal—None.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.