Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1915

Materka v. Erie Railroad

Materka v. Erie Railroad
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided October 15, 1915
88 N.J.L. 372; 95 A. 612; 1915 N.J. LEXIS 331

Counsel

For the appellant, Alexander Simpson., For the respondent, Collins & Corbin.

Materka v. Erie Railroad

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The' judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court.

For afjwmance—Ti-ie Chancelloe, Gabbison, Swayze, Tbenohabd, Bergen, Mintuen, Black, Heppenheimbe, Williams, Taylor, JJ. 10.

For reversal—None.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.