Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1916

Watson v. Magill

Watson v. Magill
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided March 6, 1916 · Affirmance, Bergen, Black, Garrison, Heppenheimer, Kalisch, Min, Parker, Reversal, Swayzb, Taylor, Teehune, Trenchakd, Turn, Vredenburgi, White, Williams
85 N.J. Eq. 592; 97 A. 43; 1916 N.J. LEXIS 416
Watson v. Magill

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion hied in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

For affirmance—Swayzb, Trenchakd, Bergen, Kalisch^ Black, White, Teehune, Williams—8. For reversal—Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Garrison, Parker, Min-turn, Vredenburgi-i, Heppenheimer, Taylor—7.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.