Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1916

Brewster v. Entz

Brewster v. Entz
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 19, 1916
86 N.J. Eq. 242; 98 A. 1084; 1 Stock. 242; 1916 N.J. LEXIS 443

Brewster v. Entz

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree is affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Griffin. By a slip of the pen, he is made to say that he will allow a decree setting aside the assignment. As the point of the opinion is that the assignment was a forgery, the language of the decree itself is correct in adjudging that the assignment is null and void.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenohakd, Parker, Bergen, Mjnturn, Kalisoi-i, Black, White, Teri-iune, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 15.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.