Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1916

Norton v. Nathanson

Norton v. Nathanson
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided November 20, 1916
86 N.J. Eq. 433; 99 A. 1070; 1 Stock. 433; 1916 N.J. LEXIS 471
Norton v. Nathanson

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Vice-Chancellor Baches, after a careful review of the testimony, reached the conclusion that the complainant had not sustained the burden of proving usury in the transactions set forth in her bill. In this conclusion we concur.

The decree of the court óf chancery is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Ci-iiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenci-iaed, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Tayloe, Gardner — 14.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.