Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1916

Clinton Amusement & Improvement Co. v. Dranow

Clinton Amusement & Improvement Co. v. Dranow
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided March 6, 1916
88 N.J.L. 701; 96 A. 893; 1916 N.J. LEXIS 239

Clinton Amusement & Improvement Co. v. Dranow

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in its per curiam, except the statement that the facts showed that the defendants surrendered the premises. We think the facts showed that the premises were not surrendered but were abandoned, and that the plaintiffs thereupon resumed control of them.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chile Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, White, Terhune, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, JJ. 12.

For reversal—None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.