Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1917

Dimler v. Caldwell

Dimler v. Caldwell
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided March 5, 1917 · Affirmance, Bergen, Black, Gardner, Garrison, Heppeni, Ieimer, Iiee, Justioe, Kalisch, Minturn, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Trejstohard, Williams
87 N.J. Eq. 366; 100 A. 154; 2 Stock. 366; 1917 N.J. LEXIS 473

Dimler v. Caldwell

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

So far as concerns the title to the property we agree with Vice-Chancellor Emery and the chancellor. So far as the decree adjudges that the complainant is entitled to a lien for $750 and *368interest, we have assumed its correctness, since there is no appeal by the defendants from that part of tire decree, and the complainant is not aggrieved thereby. The decree is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance—Ti-ib Ci-iiee-Justioe, Garrison, Swayze, Trejstohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Heppeni-ieimer, Williams, Gardner—12. For reversal—None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑