Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1917

Public Service Railway Co. v. Frazer

Public Service Railway Co. v. Frazer
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 18, 1917 · Affirmance, Bergen, Black, Gardner, Garrison, Ieppenhbimer, Kalisoi, Minturn, None, Reversal, Swayze, Taylor, Tkenchard, White, Williams
87 N.J. Eq. 679; 105 A. 391; 2 Stock. 679; 1917 N.J. LEXIS 468

Public Service Railway Co. v. Frazer

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree' is affirmed, with costs. We agree with the vice-chancellor’s construction of the jiowers vested in the Passaic Valley Sewerage Commissioners and his definition of the word “necessary.” We express no opinion on ihe question whether the covenants in the contract between the sewerage commissioners and the contractors can avail the complainant.

For affirmance—Garrison, ' Swayze, Tkenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoi-i, Black, White, I-Ieppenhbimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner—12. For reversal—None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.