Wortendyke v. Rayot

Supreme Court of New Jersey September 13, 1917

Wortendyke v. Rayot, 88 N.J. Eq. 344 (N.J. 1917)

102 A. 3; 3 Stock. 344; 1917 N.J. LEXIS 479

Affirmance, Beroten, Black, Gardner, Garrison, Heppenheimer, Kalisch, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Taylor, Trenchard, White, Williams

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will he affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Griffin in the opinion filed in the court below, and reported in 87 N. J. Eq. 159.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Beroten, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 13. For reversal — None.

Reference

Full Case Name: Raymond R. Wortendyke, trustee, &c., complainant-appellant v. Louis Rayot, defendants-respondents
Status: Published