Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1917

Provident Institution for Saving v. Mead

Provident Institution for Saving v. Mead
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided October 11, 1917 · Affirmance, Bergen, Black, Heprenheimer, Kalisch, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Taylor, Trenchard, White, Williams
88 N.J. Eq. 349; 3 Stock. 349; 102 A. 1053; 1917 N.J. LEXIS 496
Provident Institution for Saving v. Mead

Cases that cite this one

10 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevenson.

*350For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, White, Heprenheimer, Williams, Taylor — 11. For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.