Walsh v. Walsh

Supreme Court of New Jersey November 19, 1917

Walsh v. Walsh, 88 N.J. Eq. 368 (N.J. 1917)

3 Stock. 368; 104 A. 821; 1917 N.J. LEXIS 500

Affirmance, Bergen, Black, Kalisch, Minturn, None, Parker, Swayze, Trenchard, White, Williams

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This is a suit by a wife for maintenance under the statute. The vice-chancellor advised a decree for complainant. The case *370turns on findings of fact alone, and after a full examination of tlie evidence, we conclude that it is adequate to support the de-' cree made, which will therefore be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Williams — 10. For affirmance — None.

Reference

Full Case Name: Margaret Walsh, complainant-respondent v. John E. Walsh
Cited By: 5 cases
Status: Published