Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1917

Cooney v. Rushmore

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 18, 1917

90 N.J.L. 665; 100 A. 692; 1917 N.J. LEXIS 384

Counsel

For the respondent, Fort & Fort., For the appellants, Kalisch & Kalisch

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bergen in the Supreme Court.

*669For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Stvayze, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppbnhelmer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

For reversal—Hone.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.