Koenigsberger v. Mial
Koenigsberger v. Mial
90 N.J.L. 695; 101 A. 184; 1917 N.J. LEXIS 406
Opinion of the Court
The judgment under review will he affirmed, for the reasons set forth in'the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Kaltscti, White, Heppeniieiaiisr, Williams. Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.
For reversal—Hone.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.