The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kalisch in the Supreme Court, eo nomine Durkin v. Fire Commissioners of Newark, 89 N. J. L. 468.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Teenciiard, Parker, Bergen, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

For reversal—Hone.