Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1918

Heyer v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided March 14, 1918 · Affirmance, Bergen, Black, Gardner, Garrison, Heppenheimer, Kalisch, Minturn, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Trenchard, White, Williams

88 N.J. Eq. 595; 3 Stock. 595; 103 A. 1052; 1918 N.J. LEXIS 316

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Ellis v. Ellis (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1955)
Vanderbach v. Vollinger (N.J. 1949)
Middlesex County Welfare Board v. Motolinsky (New Jersey Court of Chancery 1944)
In re Fay (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1941)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We agree with the vice-chancellor that the gift was not established. We express no opinion on the other points discussed by him. Let the decree be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner — 12. For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.