State v. Runyon
State v. Runyon
94 N.J.L. 265; 109 A. 925; 1920 N.J. LEXIS 188
Opinion of the Court
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummerein the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoii, Black, White, Hbppbnheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson, JJ. 12.
For reversal—None.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.