State v. Carrigan
State v. Carrigan
94 N.J.L. 566; 111 A. 927; 1920 N.J. LEXIS 238
Opinion of the Court
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—Swayze, Trenci-iard, Bergen, IIeppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, JJ. 7.
For reversal—Parker, Kalisch, White, Taylor, JJ. 4.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.