Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1920

D'Annunzio v. D'Annunzio

D'Annunzio v. D'Annunzio
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided October 21, 1920 · Ackerson, Affirmance, Bergen, Black, Gardner, Iard, Ieimer, Iiee, Kalisci, Katzenbacii, Minturn, None, Parker, Pieppeni, Reversal, Swayze, Taylor, Trenci, White, Williams
92 N.J. Eq. 236; 7 Stock. 236; 111 A. 925; 1920 N.J. LEXIS 319

D'Annunzio v. D'Annunzio

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevenson.

*237For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenbacii, White, PIeppeni-ieimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson—15. For reversal—None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.