Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1920

Rhodes v. Rhodes

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided October 21, 1920 · Ackerson, Affirmance, Bergen, Black, Gardner, Heppenheimer, Iard, Iiee, Kalisci, Katzenbach, Minturn, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Taylor, Trenci, White, Williams

92 N.J. Eq. 252; 114 A. 414; 7 Stock. 252; 1920 N.J. LEXIS 326

Counsel

Messrs. Lambert .& Stewart, for the respondent., Mr. Frank F. Bradner, for the appellant.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lane.

For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard. Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson—15. For reversal—None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.