Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1920

Busch v. Mary A. Riddle Co.

Busch v. Mary A. Riddle Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided October 21, 1920 · Ackerson, Affirmance, Bergen, Black, Gardner, Heppenheimer, Iard, Iyalisoh, Katzenbaoh, Minturn, None, Reversal, Swayze, Taylor, Trenci, White, Williams
92 N.J. Eq. 265; 7 Stock. 265; 114 A. 348; 1920 N.J. LEXIS 329

Counsel

Mr. Frank Smaihers, for the appellant., Mr. Clarence L. Cole, for the respondent.

Busch v. Mary A. Riddle Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Bergen, Minturn, Iyalisoh, .Black, Katzenbaoh, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson—14. For reversal.—None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.