Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1920

Briggs v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided October 21, 1920 · Ackerson, Affirmance, Bergen, Black, Herpentieimer, Iard, Iiee, Kalisch, Minturn, None, Reversal, Swayze, Trenoi, White

92 N.J. Eq. 277; 114 A. 538; 7 Stock. 277; 1920 N.J. LEXIS 330

Counsel

Mr. Edward L. Katzenbach, for the appellant., Messrs. McCarter & English, for the respondent.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.

For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenoi-iard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Herpentieimer, Ackerson—10. For reversal—None.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.