Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1920

Grijnuk v. McAdoo

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided October 15, 1920 · Affirmance, Bacii, Bbkgen, Cukiam, Gaed, Hebpenueimkr, Kaliscii, Katzen, Neií, None, Reversal, Swayze, Taylor, White, Williayls

95 N.J.L. 256; 113 A. 920; 1920 N.J. LEXIS 277

Opinion of the Court

Pee CukiaM.

The judgment under review’ herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Swayze, BbkgeN, Kaliscii, KatzeN-BACii, White, HebpeNueiMKR, Williayls, Taylor, Gaed-NEIÍ, JJ. 9. For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.