State v. Gruich

Supreme Court of New Jersey November 8, 1920

State v. Gruich, 95 N.J.L. 263 (N.J. 1920)

112 A. 594; 1920 N.J. LEXIS 283

Ackerson, Affirmance, Bergen, Gardner, Heppenheimbr, Ivaliscti, Iyatzenbach, None, Reversal, Swayze, Taylor, Teenchard, White, Williams

Opinion of the Court

Per CuRIAM.

We agree with the Supreme Court as to- the only point discussed in its opinion. It was not necessary to discuss the alleged error in excluding Hunter’s testimony, as the inquiry was afterward taken up by the state and answered. Let the judgment be affirmed.

For affirmance — Swayze, TeeNchaRd, BergeN, Ivaliscti, IyATZENBACH, WHITE, HePPENHEIMBR, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER, ACKERSON, JJ. 11. For reversal — -None.

Reference

Full Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, IN ERROR v. ANNA GRUICH, IN ERROR
Status: Published