Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1920

Wilson v. District Court

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided October 15, 1920 · Affirmance, Aokerson, Bergen, Black, Chard, Chibe, Gardner, Heppeni, Ieimer, Iite, Iíalisch, Katzenbacpi, None, Pee, Reversal, Swayze, Taylor, Tren, Williams

95 N.J.L. 265; 111 A. 927; 1920 N.J. LEXIS 285

Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. '' - ‘

For affirmance — The Chibe Justice, Swayze, TreN-CHARD, BERGEN, IÍALISCH, BLACK, KaTZENBACPI, Wl-IITE, HePPENI-IEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER, AOKERSON, JJ. 13. For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.