Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1921

Janowski v. Przebieglec

Janowski v. Przebieglec
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided February 28, 1921 · Ackerson, Affirmance, Bergen, Black, Ciiiee, Gardner, Heppenheimisr, Iard, Kalisoh, Katzenbach, Minturn, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Taylor, Trenci, White, Williams
92 N.J. Eq. 453; 114 A. 419; 7 Stock. 453; 1921 N.J. LEXIS 234

Janowski v. Przebieglec

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Ciiiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimisr, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson—15. For reversal—None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.