Wilson v. Sandall

Supreme Court of New Jersey February 28, 1921

Wilson v. Sandall, 92 N.J. Eq. 463 (N.J. 1921)

7 Stock. 463; 113 A. 927; 1921 N.J. LEXIS 238

Affirmance, Aokerson, Bergen, Black, Gardner, Iteprenheimer, Kalisci, Katzbnbaci, Minturn, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Taylor, Trenchard, White, Williams

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzbnbaci-i, White, ITeprenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Aokerson—15. . For reversal—None.

Reference

Full Case Name: George Wilson, trading as United Tin Trading Company v. Marion E. Sandall
Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published