Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1921

Wilson v. Sandall

Wilson v. Sandall
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided February 28, 1921 · Affirmance, Aokerson, Bergen, Black, Gardner, Iteprenheimer, Kalisci, Katzbnbaci, Minturn, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Taylor, Trenchard, White, Williams
92 N.J. Eq. 463; 7 Stock. 463; 113 A. 927; 1921 N.J. LEXIS 238
Wilson v. Sandall

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzbnbaci-i, White, ITeprenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Aokerson—15. . For reversal—None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.