Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1921

Loudenslager v. Pacific Improvement Co.

Loudenslager v. Pacific Improvement Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided October 14, 1921 · Affirmance, Bergen, Black, Buskirk, Gardner, Heppeñheimer, Iard, Kalisoh, Katzenbaci, Minturn, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Trenoi, Williams
93 N.J. Eq. 218; 115 A. 752; 8 Stock. 218; 1921 N.J. LEXIS 280
Loudenslager v. Pacific Improvement Co.

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenoi-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Heppeñheimer, Williams, Gardner, Van Buskirk — 13. Bor reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.