LaMonte v. Mott

Supreme Court of New Jersey October 18, 1921

LaMonte v. Mott, 93 N.J. Eq. 254 (N.J. 1921)

8 Stock. 254; 1921 N.J. LEXIS 289

Affirmance, Bergen, Black, Cuetam, Gardner, Heppenheimeb, Iiee, Iyalisci, Katzenbaci, Minturn, Modification, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Trenchírd, Williams

Opinion of the Court

Per Cuetam.

The decree a]>pealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevens.

*255

For affirmance — The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, TrenchÍrd, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Iyalisci-i, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Heppenheimeb, Williams — 11. For reversal — None. For modification — Gardner—1.

Reference

Full Case Name: George M. LaMonte v. Harvey Mott
Status: Published