Charney v. Cohen

Supreme Court of New Jersey February 28, 1921

Charney v. Cohen, 95 N.J.L. 538 (N.J. 1921)

112 A. 893; 1921 N.J. LEXIS 143

Affirmance, Aokerson, Bergen, Cuejam, Gardner, Heimer, Heppen, Kaliscit, Katzenbaoh, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayzb, Taylor, Trenchard, White, Williams

Opinion of the Court

Pee Cuejam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Minturn in the-Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayzb, Trenchard, PARKER, Bergen, Kaliscit, KatzeNBAoh, White, Heppen-HEIMER, WILLIAMS,’ TAYLOR, GARDNER, AOKERSON, JJ. 13. For reversal — None.

Reference

Full Case Name: ZELDA CHARNEY, ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC., OF ISIDORE CHARNEY v. JACOB COHEN
Status: Published