Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1921

Charney v. Cohen

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided February 28, 1921 · Affirmance, Aokerson, Bergen, Cuejam, Gardner, Heimer, Heppen, Kaliscit, Katzenbaoh, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayzb, Taylor, Trenchard, White, Williams

95 N.J.L. 538; 112 A. 893; 1921 N.J. LEXIS 143

Opinion of the Court

Pee Cuejam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Minturn in the-Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayzb, Trenchard, PARKER, Bergen, Kaliscit, KatzeNBAoh, White, Heppen-HEIMER, WILLIAMS,’ TAYLOR, GARDNER, AOKERSON, JJ. 13. For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.