Hulme v. Donnelly

Supreme Court of New Jersey February 28, 1921

Hulme v. Donnelly, 95 N.J.L. 545 (N.J. 1921)

112 A. 498; 1921 N.J. LEXIS 148

Affirmance, Aokbrson, Bergen, Chancedlor, Cueiajvl, Gardner, Heppüntieimer, Justioe, Kadiscií, Kat, Mlntürn, None, Parker, Reversal, Taylor, Trexcirard, White, Williams, Zenbacu

Opinion of the Court

Per Cueiajvl

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The ChaNCedloR, Chief Justioe, TREXCirARD, PARKER, BERGEN, MlNTÜRN, KaDISCIÍ, KaT-zeNBACU, White, HeppüNTIeimer, WilliaMS, Taylor, GARDNER, AOKBRSON, JJ. 14. For reversal — None.

Reference

Full Case Name: FREDERIC L. HULME v. FREDERICK W. DONNELLY, BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF TRENTON
Status: Published